The graphic part is very elaborate and very cool, but I think there is some inconsistency in the use of secondary logos due to contradictory namings (forgive the criticism, but it pretends to be constructive). And the tagline is very little differential ...
1 comment
displayname115914
The graphic part is very elaborate and very cool, but I think there is some inconsistency in the use of secondary logos due to contradictory namings (forgive the criticism, but it pretends to be constructive). And the tagline is very little differential ...
See original
Hide original
Log in or join for Free to comment