The poster is very good, there is only one detail that generates some doubt. First I answer your questions:
Q .: Book title: In such cases, is the final period necessary or can we do without?
A .: We can and must do without. -
Q .: Point 13: Have I used that typology of numbers correctly?
A .: [Entiendo que querías decir punto 16]. We can, although they are less readable than others. -
Q .: Point 15: I have used italics to emphasize the pronunciation of the name, but should I also use it in cases like Frederick's when dealing with a foreign name?
A .: In this case, italics are used to make those words stand out. Proper names, whether foreign or not, are not italicized, therefore this expressive resource is not affected. We must know that it is italicized for another reason (to generate emphasis) and it is correct as you have used it. -
Q .: Point 20: I had doubts about how to express the schedule in a more effective way. Could you indicate any alternative?
A .: The two schedules you have written are correct. The only doubt I have is related to the thickness of that inclusive script, which I see too heavy. It may be that the design of the font is like this and not your mistake, you would have to see the design of that character in the font itself. I have a question with the asterisk, I don't know if you have put a space between the word and it. If so, it would be wrong. Everything else I see is correct.
1 comentário
displayname172098
Professor PlusHi @zomiga :
The poster is very good, there is only one detail that generates some doubt. First I answer your questions:
Q .: Book title: In such cases, is the final period necessary or can we do without?
A .: We can and must do without.
-
Q .: Point 13: Have I used that typology of numbers correctly?
A .: [Entiendo que querías decir punto 16]. We can, although they are less readable than others.
-
Q .: Point 15: I have used italics to emphasize the pronunciation of the name, but should I also use it in cases like Frederick's when dealing with a foreign name?
A .: In this case, italics are used to make those words stand out. Proper names, whether foreign or not, are not italicized, therefore this expressive resource is not affected. We must know that it is italicized for another reason (to generate emphasis) and it is correct as you have used it.
-
Q .: Point 20: I had doubts about how to express the schedule in a more effective way. Could you indicate any alternative?
A .: The two schedules you have written are correct. The only doubt I have is related to the thickness of that inclusive script, which I see too heavy. It may be that the design of the font is like this and not your mistake, you would have to see the design of that character in the font itself.
I have a question with the asterisk, I don't know if you have put a space between the word and it. If so, it would be wrong.
Everything else I see is correct.
Greetings
R.
Visualizar original
Ocultar original
Faça login ou cadastre-se Gratuitamente para comentar